- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:01:21 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, Brandon Wallace <brandon.wallace@yahoo.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > The naming suggestions are meant to (a) parallel the collection APIs, > particularly Array, which uses Array.of() as a "simple constructor" > (really, it's the monadic lifting function), and uses Array.from() as > the "conversion constructor". I think these are readable and easy to > understand, and while there are good arguments for simple copying the > resolver's method naming, I think it's even better to follow the > developing naming standard I lay out above. Where is Array.of() defined? Also, I missed this email. I thought we had agreed on accept/resolve/reject, which I've now added: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/109ec5bd6588d94df2e1c806efb55bd24d301db7 -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 14:01:49 UTC