- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:08:03 +0200
- To: www-dom@w3.org, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:11:56 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 4/15/13 11:30 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>> How many sites are we talking about here?
>
> Any site using SoftXMLLib.js (possibly old versions of?) or old versions
> of zXml.
>
> How many that is, unclear. We've had reports about two of them in the
> <2 months since we shipped this in a final release.
OK.
http://www.softxml.com/softxmllib/SoftXMLLib.js
It still has the "LS" check.
I've submitted feedback to the SoftXMLLib project using the form in
http://www.softxml.com/softxmllib/softxmllib.htm
[[
In http://www.softxml.com/softxmllib/SoftXMLLib.js
Please remove the use of document.implementation.hasFeature('LS', '3.0')
and document.implementation.createLSParser(1,null). It is not necessary
anymore and is causing problems for browsers and may cause the
specification for hasFeature to special-case 'LS' if there are many sites
using SoftXMLLib.js.
Also see
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=848081
http://www.w3.org/mid/516C26CC.8050603@mit.edu
Feel free to comment on the Mozilla bug or post to www-dom@w3.org if you
have comments or questions about this.
Thanks
]]
I don't object to special-casing "LS" in the spec if you end up
implementing that in Gecko.
>> From what I can tell, the site
>> referenced in the bug report has been fixed.
>
> Er... which one? The bug was filed by the developer of some sort of web
> application (without a link), and the site mentioned in comment 8 of the
> bug is certainly not fixed.
Oh, I probably meant the link-less web application. I didn't notice the
site in comment 8.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 17:08:22 UTC