W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: hasFeature revisited

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:38:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78giWMPHbXgSLptP1KwwYestJP3TsPB3=pHJt-4gmNK8zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
> How many sites are we talking about here? From what I can tell, the site
> referenced in the bug report has been fixed. With no other known sites being
> affected, I suggest we keep the spec as is for now.
> I tried searching http://webdevdata.org/ data-dec2012.zip for
> ".createLSParser(", no results, and ".hasFeature(" only had "XPath" and two
> SVG features. Although the data set is limited, of course, so it doesn't
> tell us much.

SVG guys, what are you doing with feature strings these days? Has the
time come where it can be completely obsoleted? Having hasFeature()
simply always return true, without an exception for SVG, would be even
better I think. See also:

Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 15:39:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:02 UTC