W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: [futures] Add convenience functions for immediate/canceled promises

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:10:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCfYCYhFeKL34qmErFA4jEAqZmZOm2J4hzaNER7WHhHcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
Cc: Brandon Wallace <brandon.wallace@yahoo.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Domenic Denicola
<domenic@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> The conventional name for these two methods would be Future.resolve and Future.reject. The implementation would be
> Future.resolve = (x) => new Future(({ resolve }) => resolve(x));
> Future.reject = (reason) => new Future(({ reject }) => reject(reason));
> This has the added benefit of using "resolve" semantics, i.e. assimilating thenables (including existing promises on the web, like jQuery promises).

Now that I've actually learned the difference between accept() and
resolve(), I'd prefer that all three of the resolution methods exist
as statics on the Future interface.  You don't always want resolve

Received on Friday, 12 April 2013 18:11:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:02 UTC