- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:15:13 +0100
- To: Brandon Wallace <brandon.wallace@yahoo.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Brandon Wallace <brandon.wallace@yahoo.com> wrote: > The example code in 4.1 references "Future.when()" but I don't see any > definition for this method. I forgot to rename it to Future.every. > For Future.every() and Future.some(), I did not see anything requiring the > order of the values array supplied to the callbacks should match the order > of the futures supplied. These methods will be harder to use without this > requirement. Clarified. > A fourth static would be nice that behaves similar to Task.WhenAll() in the > .Net Framework (1) > > Future.???() - Almost like 'every' except that it waits for all futures to > complete and if any were rejected then rejects the future with an array of > the rejection values. > > (1) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh194874.aspx If we continue the Array analogy this would be Future.map() I think. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 17:15:42 UTC