- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:27:35 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "DOM WG" <www-dom@w3.org>
Thanks for your response. I indeed started a CSS draft that doesn't reference the features described here. I just feel (and I wasn't alone) that DOM and CSS should keep parity here if we want to implement that feature. It's not possible to define such pseudo-classes if you don't define progress events in the DOM, whatever they are, because we need an event to trigger pseudo-class "rematching". In fact, what we need is some way to "know" how far the download process is gone for any element which can trigger a download. I may want, in the future, to simplify that proposal to only include really needed components, but I feel that many of what I propose is requierd. Anyway, if you want to see my "contributor draft", it's located here : http://fremycompany.com/TR/2012/ED-css-content-state/ Regards, François -----Message d'origine----- From: Anne van Kesteren Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 1:00 PM To: DOM WG ; François REMY Cc: Alex Mogilevsky ; Lea Verou Subject: Re: [progress-events] Loading, Interactive and Error states for downloaded resources -- fallback content On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:04:51 +0100, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Dear DOM Working Group, We're called WebApps, fwiw. I read through this a few times and while there may be use cases for some more CSS pseudo-classes (though some seem problematic cross-origin, unless CORS is in place), I'm not really convinced all the API bloat is needed. You can easily define pseudo-classes without new APIs. If you need certain hooks in the loading process I'd recommend filing bugs on the HTML fetching algorithm with specific requests. Some kind of evaluation of Mozilla's pseudo-classes for this would probably also be good to make, to see what the problems were and how they were addressed. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 19 February 2012 17:28:07 UTC