- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:28:44 +0100
- To: "Ryosuke Niwa" <rniwa@webkit.org>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-dom@w3.org
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:17:52 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > I really think that the whole named getter issue is something that we > should not take lightly. It has many similarities with the scope chain > issue for on* attributes in that it causes namespace collisions making > it hard to add features in the future. > > It seems to me that we should at least try to avoid propagating the > named getter behavior any further, and ideally try to actively > deprecate it to see if it's possible. Named getters are nice for authors, and besides, it was already pointed out it's not avoidable here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2012JanMar/0008.html -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 08:29:21 UTC