- From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@webkit.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:18:05 -0700
- To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABNRm62ZC+2rqp_sg7iw=PdsCtctQRRUTDJW=z+we5PGSKqkPA@mail.gmail.com>
Are you suggesting that getElementsBy* on ShadowRoot will return a static node list? If so, that's inconsistent with the existing ones. If not, then getElementsBy* return HTMLCollection, and I'm strongly opposed to adding any new method that returns live node list or HTMLCollection. They impose significant performance burdens and design constraints on all DOM mutations. On Jun 29, 2012 11:05 AM, "Elliott Sprehn" <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: > DocumentFragment has querySelector and friends, but doesn't have > getElementById or getElementByClass etc. Because of this the methods were > explicitly added to ShadowRoot which seems kind of silly. There's also > innerHTML on ShadowRoot but not on DocumentFragment. > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html#shadow-root-object > > Could we get these methods added to DocumentFragment instead? > > HTMLElement getElementById(in DOMString elementId); > NodeList getElementsByClassName(in DOMString tagName); > NodeList getElementsByTagName(in DOMString className); > NodeList getElementsByTagNameNS(DOMString namespace, DOMString localName); > attribute DOMString innerHTML; > > - Elliott >
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 18:18:33 UTC