- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:33:41 -0400
- To: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>
Comments from this list's members re the proposal below are also welcome. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Rescinding the DOM 2 View Recommendation? Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:18:51 +0000 Resent-From: <public-webapps@w3.org> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:17:53 -0400 From: ext Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> Anne, Ms2ger, All, Anne and others proposed in [Proposal] the DOM 2 View Recommendation [D2V] be "rescinded". The rescinding process is defined in the Process Document [Rescind]. However, Ian Jacobs just indicated in IRC [#webapps] it has never actually been used. One process requirement for rescinding a Recommendation is a "separate rationale for the proposal to rescind". Would you Anne and/or someone please create the rationale document (using WebApps' wiki)? I think it should include a clear problem statement i.e. identify the interop issues this Recommendation is causing as well as the alternative (new) solution. If anyone has comments about this proposal, please speak up. -ArtB [Proposal] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0454.html [D2V] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Views/ [#webapps] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20110810
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 17:34:04 UTC