- From: Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:22:21 +0000
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, Sergey Ilinsky <sergey@ilinsky.com>
Hi Sergey, Following up on this issue, the spec now has a reference to HTML5 where this behavior is defined. Let us know if you have additional comments/concerns with this change. Thanks, Jacob ============================================== From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 01:13:05 -0700 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=QZ9X5yLmtkoZdcn2FnNh_H1UgWoeA3Oms6WFA@mail.gmail.com> To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org> On 10/5/10, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > ISSUE-145 (event handler ordering): Ordering event handlers registered by > different means [DOM3 Events] > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/145 > > Raised by: Doug Schepers > On product: DOM3 Events > > Sergey Ilinsky in > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010JulSep/0192.html>: > [[ > Has the issue of ordering execution of handlers added by the following means > been addressed? > a) node.oneventx = f; > b) node.setAttribute("eventx", f) > c) node.addEventListener("eventx", f) > [...] Yes. I explained this in thread "event.returnValue", which was filtered out. Then Hallvord reposted to the list and cc'd me, and it was again filtered. Then Hallvord I believe reposted my post with a bcc to me and it made it. The thread (please look it up) explains that order is covered in HTML 5. Garrett
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 17:22:51 UTC