- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:48:44 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > > generic except for the argument names, but you can just refer to the > > arguments by position rather than name. Then there'd be just one prose > > line and some IDL each time. > > Well no. You also need to define the event initialization dictionary and > how it maps to the event. I do not think that can be done in a generic > way. You have to give the IDL for the dictionary, but can't you just say that the dictionary fields map 1:1 with the fields of the same name on the event object? What needs defining? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2011 16:49:18 UTC