- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:53:43 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>
Le 16/06/11 14:45, Doug Schepers a écrit : > Hi, Daniel- > > First, let me say that I think it's a good idea to start thinking about > CSS events. Thanks. > However, we clearly don't have consensus on that yet, or existing > implementations, so I believe that DOM 4 (aka DOM Core) is the proper > place to define them, rather than DOM3 Events; DOM 4 has already been > started, so I don't think we will have any more delay specifying them > there than in DOM3 Events. I'm perfectly fine with that if you guys a) think it's not worth delaying the spec b) already plan to think about it for next level. I only thought it was worth commenting about that and pointing out that we may need such events in the near future. > Alternately, they could be defined in some separate spec... a CSS Events > spec, perhaps? If you mean a spec about CSS Events hosted by your WG, yes. A spec hosted by CSS WG, I don't think so: I'd rather leave DOM (if you except the CSS Object Model) outside of CSS WG's scope. If you guys starts a CSS Events spec, be sure we will contribute and help, no worries. > I'd like to hear from implementers on their opinions, and from my > co-editor Jacob Rossi, as well as the rest of the WebApps and CSS > communities. Yeah I think it makes sense. I mean if implementors are going to implement such events in the near future, well... </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 12:54:12 UTC