Re: Deprecation of DOMAttrModified (Was: DOMActivate vs. Activation Behavior)

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:18 AM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> Ah, I understand your argument now.
>
> …
>
> In any case, I don't think mutation events is the path forward here.
> We at mozilla want to phase them out due to the various problems that
> they have, and my guess is that microsoft won't implement them for the
> same reason. This won't change no matter what the spec says.
>
> Agreed. My request was to retain DOMAttrModified or provide a suitable
> replacement. I don't have any particular attachment to the current mutation
> event model, as long as there is a long term goal to provide a standardized
> method for author notification when a specific attribute changes.

There definitely is.

/ Jonas

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 19:54:37 UTC