Re: Deprecation of DOMAttrModified (Was: DOMActivate vs. Activation Behavior)

On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> Ah, I understand your argument now. 
…
> 
> In any case, I don't think mutation events is the path forward here.
> We at mozilla want to phase them out due to the various problems that
> they have, and my guess is that microsoft won't implement them for the
> same reason. This won't change no matter what the spec says.

Agreed. My request was to retain DOMAttrModified or provide a suitable replacement. I don't have any particular attachment to the current mutation event model, as long as there is a long term goal to provide a standardized method for author notification when a specific attribute changes.

James

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 18:19:02 UTC