On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:39:58 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> Finally, it doesn't seem like namespaced events even solves a real >> problem. If you want to avoid naming conflicts you can call your >> events "com.example.www.myEvent", or even >> >> "http://www.example.com/myEventsNameSpace/applications/mail/emailReceived". > > The latter would actually not work due to the NCName restrictions, though > maybe that should be removed too to make this possible. Yeah, that seems like a good idea. For the record, I think I should fess up to being an advocate for the namespaced methods way back when we discussed it in Oslo in 2006. I believe Maciej was advocating for nuking the namespaced methods. I now believe that he was right and I was wrong :) / JonasReceived on Sunday, 13 September 2009 02:03:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:36:55 UTC