- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:26:55 -0700
- To: Jacob Rossi <t-jacobr@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <travil@microsoft.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-forms@w3.org" <public-forms@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Jacob Rossi<t-jacobr@microsoft.com> wrote: > Yes, so in response to that action, here's how IE handles focus events: > In response to what action? > focus, blur, focusin, and focusout can be registered on any element which is "focusable." > Too bad that that is not what actually happens in IE. Should it? For example, the P element can be made focusable in many browsers by giving it a tabindex. If the p is focused, and there is an enter keypress, does onclick fire? Here is what HTML 5 has to say about it: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/editing.html#focus I only skimmed, but saw: "The tabindex content attribute specifies whether the element is focusable"... and "This means that an element that is only focusable because of its tabindex attribute will fire a click event in response to a non-mouse activation (e.g. hitting the "enter" key while the element is focused)." That sounds idealistic. Something Opera might do. -------------------------------------------------- Tab to the P and hit enter. Result: IE 7, IE 8, Firefox 3.5.1, Safari 4.0.2: onclick does not fire. Opera 9.6.4 " [p clicked] " (onclick fired) <p id='p' tabindex="0" onclick="this.firstChild.data += ' [p clicked] ';" onfocus="this.firstChild.data += ' [p focused] ' ;"> p has onclick and tabindex </p> <button onclick="this.firstChild.data += ' [button clicked] ' ;">button </button> </p> ---------------------------------------------------- [snip explanation] Garrett > --Jacob > > ________________________________________ > From: Doug Schepers [schepers@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:06 PM > To: Anne van Kesteren > Cc: Jacob Rossi; Maciej Stachowiak; Travis Leithead; www-dom@w3.org; public-forms@w3.org > Subject: Re: Deprecating DOMFocusIn/DOMFocusOut > > Hi, Anne- > > Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 7/22/09 6:12 PM): >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:05:25 +0200, Doug Schepers<schepers@w3.org> >> wrote: >>> Taking a look at the current state of implementation [1], and >>> seeing the similarity of function between IE's focusin/focusout >>> and DOMFocusIn/DOMFocusOut, I have now included focusin/focusout, >>> and deprecated DOMFocusIn/DOMFocusOut in favor of those event >>> types. This is a tentative decision, but it seems logical to me; >>> any comments are welcome. >> >> There are no focusin and focusout events. At least, I believe last I >> checked onfocusin in SVG mapped to an existing focus event. If >> anything we should use focus and blur. > > As I said, I added focusin and focusout events in the same draft as I > deprecated DOMFocusIn and DOMFocusOut, because focusin and focusout are > supported by IE. I chose to deprecate DOMFocusIn and DOMFocusOut in > favor of focusin and focusout because they both bubble, unlike focus and > blur. > > However, there may be other differences between DOMFocusIn/DOMFocusOut > and focusin/focusout, such as when they fire in relation to focus and > blur. Olli and Jacob have taken actions to clarify that for us. > > So, the issue is not completely resolved, but I'll leave the draft the > way it is until we know more. I also want to hear from other working > groups (including Forms, WAI, and SVG) before we finalize on a decision. > > >>> I have not deprecated DOMActivate, because it seems different >>> enough from 'click' to me, >> >> How is it different? As far as I know they are identical in >> function. > > No, as Maciej said (twice), DOMActivate is essentially a subset of click > that is only fired when something is activated. > > >>> and is widely referenced enough that I think it should be retained >>> (though it has a terrible name). Firefox has implemented it, so >>> I'd be curious to here them respond to Maciej's claims that it >>> breaks existing Web content. >> >> That was not the claim. > > I wrote this email in a rush (the D3E telcon was starting), and didn't > state that as clearly as I could have; I didn't mean it to sound > controversial. However, Boris understood what I meant and responded to > my satisfaction. > > >> Also, what does deprecation mean here? > > That existing implementations that support DOMFocusIn and DOMFocusOut > should continue to do so, to support existing content that uses them, > but that all implementation should use the replacement events instead. > Unless they have a market need, implementations that don't already > support deprecated events should not support them in future versions. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > >
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 06:27:37 UTC