- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:42:20 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, www-dom@w3.org
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:40:24 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak > <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > >> May I ask, what's up with using www-dom for DOM3 Events discussion >> now instead of the WEbApps WG list? Did I miss a memo? > > Several, I guess. May I ask the reason for doing this? But it does not seem like a positive thing to require Web Apps WG members to subscribe to an extra list, and will likely exclude people from the discussion who could have useful input (as I think already happened here). It also seems out of line with our charter, and is not reflected on our Working Group's Web page, which implies public-webapps is our only working list. If it's just from a desire to segregate list traffic for filtering/archiving purposes, then perhaps we could subscribe public- webapps to www-dom to make sure no one is left out of the discussion, including for example new WG members who may not know they need to subscribe to an extra list. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 14:42:58 UTC