- From: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:11:17 +1000
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- CC: www-dom@w3.org, "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <4A38DD65.1000009@westnet.com.au>
I've made some changes to make this demo more realistic: 1. use document.body.clientHeight to force a rendering update. 2. insert HTML with more complex layout. The original HTML "<span>A</span>" repeated 1024 times had a extreme ratio of DOMNodeInserted events to layout complexity. 3. make the insertion point 5 DIVs deeper in the document. My results (approximately): Firefox: 40ms -> 50ms Webkit: 28ms -> 31ms Opera: 35ms -> 45ms This is still a shallow and wide HTML fragment being inserted - 128 DOMNodeInserted events for not much content. In the real-world I would imagine that the non-JS overhead of DOMNodeInserted events is almost always irrelevant to the UX. The JS cost will be incurred no matter what form of handling is provided. The test-page is attached. I'll endeavour to provide realistic tests for other Mutation Events in the next few days. Sean François REMY wrote: > Result on my computer : > > Test 1 (something is done by JScript) > IE: Not Applicable > FireFox: 30 > 160 (x5 or +130) > Chrome: 5 > 60 (x10 or +55) > Opera: 15 > 45 (x3 or +30) > > Test 2 (nothing is done by JScript, just for comparaison) > IE: Not Applicable > FireFox: 30 > 80 (x3 or +50) > Chrome: 5 > 40 (x8 or +35) > Opera: 15 > 30 (x2 or +15) > > There's cleary two factors that apply : > ==> Time needed to move from managed C++ to unmanaged JScript > ==> Time of JScript execution > > These two factors are clearly dependant of the browser. In FireFox, it > seems there's clearly a problem with that. > Others browsers react smartly enough. > > Regards, Fremy > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Michael A. Puls II" <shadow2531@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 3:49 PM > To: <www-dom@w3.org> > Subject: Mutation events - slowness examples > >> Are there any example pages of mutation events being really slow and >> causing things to lag? >> >> Are they always slow in every browser? >> >> -- >> Michael >> >
Attachments
- text/html attachment: test2.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 12:12:02 UTC