Re: write and UTF-16[BE|LE]

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:39, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> Looking again at XML 1.0 3rd, it says that UTF-16 encoded entities MUST
> being with a BOM. Unless I'm misinterpreting the meaning of "UTF-16
> encoded entities", I would say that it does include UTF16-BE and
> UTF16-LE as well.

Correction, after stopping by Martin Duerst's office: I was
misinterpreting the meaning of "UTF16 encoded entities". The BOM is
indeed not required for UTF-16BE or UTF-16LE.

Philippe

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2004 17:49:55 UTC