- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:49:39 -0500
- To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
- Cc: WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2004 17:49:55 UTC
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:39, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > Looking again at XML 1.0 3rd, it says that UTF-16 encoded entities MUST > being with a BOM. Unless I'm misinterpreting the meaning of "UTF-16 > encoded entities", I would say that it does include UTF16-BE and > UTF16-LE as well. Correction, after stopping by Martin Duerst's office: I was misinterpreting the meaning of "UTF16 encoded entities". The BOM is indeed not required for UTF-16BE or UTF-16LE. Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2004 17:49:55 UTC