- From: Ray Whitmer <ray@xmission.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:44:14 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Perhaps a name change is in order? Perhaps XPath2Result would be a > little less confusing, or perhaps something completely different like > Sequence or XPath2Sequence, since in XPath 2.0 a sequence of one item > is equivalent to the item itself. That is a very good suggestion to change the name. The result sometimes represents a sequence and sometimes does not, so I am not sure that naming it XPath2Sequence is a good idea. XPath2Result sounds good to me.
Received on Monday, 25 August 2003 15:28:53 UTC