- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: 11 Aug 2003 17:03:22 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>, WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 12:20, Martin Duerst wrote: > > > 1.7.3, MouseEvent interface: thanks for the addition of altGraphKey, > > > but this is still missing an important modifier, that for the right > > > Ctrl key. This is distinct from the left Ctrl key and is standardized > > > by ISO 9995 as the Group Select key. It is a modifier just like > > > Shift, Alt, etc. It is not the same as the Meta key, some keyboards > > > (notably Macintosh) have both. > > > > > > 1.7.4, KeyboardEvent interface: same comment as above for the missing > > > attribute for the right Ctrl modifier key. > > > >We don't support right or left in the modifiers. If an application > >wishes to distinguish right and left controls, it should listen to > >Keyboard events and get the location when the keyIdentifier is > >"Control". > > Does the spec say so, or does the reader have to infer that? > The spec should say so. I added a note for that effect on the getModifierState methods so the spec will say so. > > > 1.7.2 there should be a prominent pointer from here to the examples in > > > Appendix A. > > > >Fixed > >[[ > >Refer to Key identifiers for keyboard events for examples on how text > >events are used in combination with keyboard events. > >]] > > Can you change the text so that it explicitly mentions "Appendix A" > (at least in the printed version). done. > > > 1.7.4 DOM_KEY_LOCATION_UNKNOWN: It seems to be a bad idea to have this > > > at 0x04. Why not e.g. move it up to 0x80, so that there is space for > > > potential future standardization? > > > >This constant has been removed. > > Does this mean that there are no private key locations? If so, that's > okay with us. It does mean that the specification is not addressing private key locations and such keys are outside the defined constants. > > > A.1, third example: In the PDF version (probably also PS), replace > > > љ by the actual character. > > > >Unfortunately, html2ps doesn't support the character and except stealing > >the actual shape from a converter that is able to generate it, > > Is it possible to add some kind of note here in the PDF/PS versions, > so that readers don't get confused, and check the HTML? While we say > that the normative version is HTML, I guess implementers often work > from a printout. done. > > > A.1.2: Clearly say that textInput events should return data in NFC. > > > >Added: > >[[ > >Characters should be normalized as defined by the Unicode normalization > >form NFC, defined in [UTR #15]. > >]] > > I didn't find this text. In > http://www.w3.org/2003/06/WD-DOM-Level-3-Events-20030627/keyset.html > I found: > "The sequence of keystrokes "U+0302" (Combining Circumflex Accent key) and > "U+0045" (Latin Capital Letter E key) will likely produce (on a PC/AT > french keyboard using a french mapping and without any modifier activated) > the Unicode character e^ (Latin Small Letter E With Circumflex), as > preferred by the Unicode Normalization Form NFC:" > > This is not as normative as the text you propose above > (which should say who is responsible, i.e. that textInput > events should give back their text in NFC). The test was added on the data ttribute of the TextEvent interface: http://www.w3.org/2003/06/WD-DOM-Level-3-Events-20030627/events.html#Events-UIEvent-data Philippe
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 17:03:33 UTC