- From: Gopal Sharma <gopal.sharma@sun.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 18:20:59 +0530
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Ramesh Mandava <Ramesh.Mandava@sun.com>, WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
Hi Philippe, I really couldn't notice any change in Java Bindings while re-generating LS by following below steps. Are DOMWriter/DOMOutputStream etc. moved to L3 Core ? Thanks - Gopal Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: >On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 14:25, Ramesh Mandava wrote: > > >>Hi: >> As part of DOM Level 3 Load and Save specification ( June 19 2003 : >>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-DOM-Level-3-LS-20030619 ) java binding "DOMWriter" >>is moved to >> >> "org.w3c.dom.DOMWriter" ( similarly DOMOutputStream ) . The idea may be to put >>this as part of "DOM Level 3 Core specification". >> >> But the latest available version of "DOM L3 Core spec [ June 9,2003 ]" ( >>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-DOM-Level-3-Core-20030609 ) doesn't specify this >>interface. >> >> Can't the different DOM L3 specs can be in sync?? Is somebody trying to >>resolve this issue?? >> >> > >I published a corrected version of the DOM script generator [1], and >uploaded a compiled version at: >http://www.w3.org/2003/06/27-specgenerator.jar > >use it as follows: >java -jar 27-specgenerator.jar \ >--map-type Java void void --bindings \ >http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-DOM-Level-3-LS-20030619/xml-source.xml > >You'll need SAX and DOM bindings in your classpath as well. > >This will generate appropriate bindings, according to their definitions >in the LS chapter. Apologies for the inconvenience. > >I also noted that the IDL in the LS specification contains errors (some >parameter names conflict with their types). "context" is also used as a >parameter name but is reserved by the OMG specification to be used as >context objects for operations. So expect some parameter renaming in the >next version of LS (not an issue for Java, but it is an issue for some >bindings such as Python). This includes the methods parseWithContext, >startElement, acceptNode, write, writeURI, writeToString, and saveXML. > >We tried to make sure that LS and Core are in sync (which is why you >have the issue DOMSerializer-iucd-issue in the LS specification), so any >inconsistency found between those specifications is an error and needs >to be reported as such in this mailing list. > >Philippe > >[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/java/classes/org/w3c/tools/specgenerator/ > > > >
Received on Monday, 7 July 2003 08:27:10 UTC