- From: Ray Whitmer <RayDWhitmer@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 08:02:06 -0600
- To: raydwhitmer@aol.com
- CC: Keizi@mail.co.kr, www-dom@w3.org
raydwhitmer@aol.com wrote: >Keizi@mail.co.kr wrote: > > > >>http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/glossary.html#dt-interface >>define the term 'interface' as a set of methods. >> >>But IDLs of DOM declare properties as well as methods. >>How to implement such properties on interfaces? >> >>What is standard de facto for implementation of that? >>As Java does, ::getXXX() and ::setXXX() is the answer? >>Or nothing special but up to each implementators? >> >>Best regard, >>kz. >> >> >> >It is generally up to the binding creator, not the implementor, to >follow the rules of the binding when doing this sort of thing. > > I meant it is up to the binding creator to establish the rules of the binding appropriate to the environment. He cannot follow what he is creating. >In the case of Java, this means using a getter and setter. > >In the case of ECMAScript, this typically is exposed as a real attribute. > >When creating other bindings, the creator should use whatever is natural >for the binding. > >Ray > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:02:05 UTC