- From: Allen, Michael B (RSCH) <Michael_B_Allen@ml.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:53:00 -0500
- To: "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- cc: "'www-dom@w3.org'" <www-dom@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Arnold, Curt [SMTP:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com] > <snip irrelevant stuff> > If there is a clear reason that you must do your own implementation, then > you can learn a lot by referencing the existing implementations. > How would he know if an implementation was correct? > The DOM recommendation is totally about outward appearances, not > implementation details. > Well then the outward appearance to me is that the description of the Attr node's children is vague. Perhaps if I understood XML well it might make sense but I don't and after looking over the section on Attribute Types in the XML spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#attdecls, nothing really jumps out at me. It would be nice if you could spice up the description of structurual requirements for Attr. Mike
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 21:53:03 UTC