- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Apr 2002 15:50:05 -0400
- To: Rahul Srivastava <Rahul.Srivastava@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org, Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com, Amit.Handa@Sun.COM
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 10:53, Rahul Srivastava wrote: > > Arnold, Curt wrote... > > > > > > Basically, the WG decided that the explicit statement that setting a > > nodeValue has no effect when nodeValue is defined to be null took precedence > > over throwing an exception when the node is readonly. > > As of today DOM L1 SE, L2, L3 say: > "The value of this node, depending on its type; see the table above. When it is > definied to be null, setting it has no effect". > > But no one, neither errata says that no effect takes precedence over throwing > exception. > > Is the precedence clause going to be in DOM L1 SE, L2 errata and L3? It is going to be a L2 erratum and included in L3. Regarding DOM L1 SE, no further developement are planned on it. Someone suggested a few months ago that it would be better to remove it. Philippe
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 15:50:12 UTC