- From: jonathan chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:25:28 +0100
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Dmitry Kirsanov" <dmitry@kirsanov.com>, <www-dom@w3.org>
I don't believe scrolling is a 'good' use of the mousewheel. It really remains to be seen what its purpose may be, however, I recommend In the blink of an eye by walter murch: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1879505231/102-5141812-9912119 for those having problems, his main issue with digital film editing was the absence of a wheel. Anyone who feels they know better had better have a pretty wonderful CV visions of mine include a variation on drop down menus, linked in a previous mail, and speeding throught the history, for those who prefer pictures to words.... thanks jonathan chetwynd peepo project manager ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com> To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> Cc: "Dmitry Kirsanov" <dmitry@kirsanov.com>; <www-dom@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:46 PM Subject: Re: DOM events - mousewheel? > > >btw, the current intent for events is to describe them at the semantic > >level instead of the device level. > > Agreed. If there was going to be a standardized event for this it should > probably be the semantic event -- probably a scrolling event, since that's > what the wheel usually maps to -- rather than the low-level one. > > The DOM WG isn't defining every possible device event, or even every > possible semantic event. A lot of that will wind up being someone else's > responsibilities. Note that the DOM doesn't _have_ to define them all, > since the DOM event system will happily propigate events other than those > defined in this spec. > > ______________________________________ > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 15:25:55 UTC