- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:40:26 -0700
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org, "Michael B. Allen" <mballen@erols.com>
> We changed the specification following a comment from > Ralph Levien during the CR phase: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2000JanMar/0289.html That shows that several folk raised the issue of that change introducing an asymmetry with respect to addEventListener(), which should have been dealt with at the same time. I think the corresponding change on the addEventListener side is a guarantee that a listener added to the current node _will_ be invoked as appropriate. That still leaves the order of event delivery loosely defined, but doesn't create a surprise in the API model. (And it'd certainly reduce implementation complexity.) - Dave
Received on Monday, 20 August 2001 18:41:45 UTC