- From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:25:11 -0400
- To: www-dom@w3.org
> it is called "node" (see INVALID_NODE_TYPE_ERR and > HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR). Agreed. newParent is clearly what was intended. I'd say we should accept that one as an editorial erratum. (If we hadn't marked "node" as being a keyword, I'd be tempted to claim this was just a sloppy phrasing of "the argument node" and let it go as suboptimal-but-harmless. But if we did that we should fix the markup... and if we're going to edit it at all, we should fix it properly.) ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
Received on Friday, 17 August 2001 10:25:48 UTC