Re: Namespace treatment, cloning and node.supports

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 wrote:

> > (3) node.cloneNode: Cloning an unspecified attribute node should
> > return a specified attribute node, shouldn't it?
> Yes. That should probably be documented. Good catch.

While we are at it, removing an unspecified attribute node should 
probably flip the bit, before inserting a new unspecified attribute 
in its place.  I don't think that is covered by specified rules,
and would otherwise allow you to move an unspecified node to
another element.

Ray Whitmer

Received on Tuesday, 29 February 2000 13:17:37 UTC