- From: Mike Champion <mcc@arbortext.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:24:57 -0400
- To: Eric Vasilik <ericvas@microsoft.com>, www-dom@w3.org
At 02:12 AM 5/27/98 -0400, Eric Vasilik wrote: > >I think it is implicit that node insertion passes ownership to the >tree/parent-node regardless of the language or memory management being used. Does language to this effect need to be in the spec? This still "smells" to me like language-specific memory management that MIGHT have to be discussed in the language bindings, but we've agreed doesn't belong in the spec. Am I missing something? Mike
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 1998 09:29:13 UTC