- From: (wrong string) é <wdonne@ibm.net>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 14:32:56 +0200
- To: DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
Hi There is a problem with TreeIterator being derived from NodeIterator. A TreeIterator is initialized with a node. Because it is a NodeIterator, the inherited operations talk about the children of the initialization node. That means the TreeIterator operations numChildren, toFirstChild, toLastChild and toNthChild have no meaning. The NodeIterator operations getLength, toFirstNode, toLastNode and moveTo provide the intended meaning respectively. If this interpretation is wrong then the TreeIterator is a NodeIterator over the children of the parent node of the initialization node, that happens to be positioned at the initialization node. In that case the operations toPreviousSibling and toNextSibling have no meaning. The NodeIterator operations toPrevNode and toNextNode provide the intended meaning respectively. In any case, the additional operations should have the same, new, semantics regarding iterator position the inherited operations have. If TreeIterator must inherit from NodeIterator the only additional operations that are needed in it are "up" and "down". These add tree navigation to a NodeIterator. The up operation is what toParent is now. The down operation goes one level deeper through the node the iterator is now positioned in front of. The new state of the iterator is the same as if it were initialized with the node the iterator was positioned in front of in the old state. Regards, -- Werner Donné Re BVBA Leuvenselaan 172 B-3300 Tienen tel: (+32) 16 810203 fax: (+32) 16 820826 E-mail: wdonne@ibm.net
Received on Monday, 20 April 1998 08:31:21 UTC