- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:21:01 +0200
- To: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
My vote: A) -0 B) 0 C) +0.5 D) -0 E) 0 F) +0.5 G) +1 -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com] Skickat: den 22 augusti 2001 00:38 Till: 'www-dom-ts@w3.org' Ämne: RE: SURVEY: Test case naming > I do think shorter names would be good. I'd prefer a > compromise between short and mnemonic but I'm slightly > concerned that F/G might start to become rather verbose again > ("Element_getAttributesByTagName27" is exactly 32 characters.) Good point. > > I'm not really concerned about preserving the history right > now, since there isn't much history yet to be preserved... [dd] Also a good point. > I haven't looked at the testcase DTD recently, so this may be > a dumb question -- Does it allow sufficiently structured > internal documentation to build an index of the testcases > sorted by interface, feature, and brief description? If not, > should it? It does. A test or suite contain a <metadata> element that contains elements patterned after Dublin Core. Each test should contain several <subject resource="uri"/> which points to specific passages in the spec. Transforms/subjects.xsl will produce a list of canonical URL's for a particular spec.
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 07:21:19 UTC