- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:48:29 -0700
- To: "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:09:10 -0800 From: fantasai To: Mats Palmgren On 02/12/2018 06:27 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote: > Thanks for your answers, I really appreciate it. > > On 2/12/18 8:22 AM, fantasai wrote: >> On 02/11/2018 07:06 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote: >>> I'm assuming that the clamping in §6.6 occurs regardless of whether >>> we're sizing the grid container under a min-content constraint, >>> max-content constraint, or no constraint. Is this correct? >> >> Yes. > > I originally read the clamping rule in §6.6 as only applying to > Automatic Minimum Size (AMS), because that's what §6.6 is about. > This misunderstanding is what lead to bug 1427608 - we never apply > any clamping to the grid item's max-content size for example, because > that's not a *minimum* size. No, you're correct. The clamping only applies to the AMS. But it applies to the AMS no matter what constraint the grid is being sized as. Is that making sense now? > (CC Rego and me if you file a spec issue, otherwise one of us surely > will ;-) ) Sure. :) ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 26 March 2018 19:49:07 UTC