Re: SotD sections for fxtf and houdini drafts

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:05 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> [ To the member list since it's administrivia, but cc:ed to a public
>   list since it may as well be public. ]
>
> Current CSSWG drafts have boilerplate in the "Status of this
> document" section that says:
>
>> GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion of this specification.
>> When filing an issue, please put the text “css-animations” in the
>> title, preferably like this: “[css-animations] …summary of
>> comment…”. All issues and comments are archived, and there is also
>> a historical archive.
>
> However, fxtf drafts and houdini drafts still have the old text:
>
>> The (archived) public mailing list public-fx@w3.org (see
>> instructions) is preferred for discussion of this specification.
>> When sending e-mail, please put the text “motion” in the subject,
>> preferably like this: “[motion] …summary of comment…”
> or:
>> The (archived) public mailing list public-houdini@w3.org (see
>> instructions) is preferred for discussion of this specification.
>> When sending e-mail, please put the text “css-paint-api” in the
>> subject, preferably like this: “[css-paint-api] …summary of
>> comment…”
>
> I *think* we should fix these to be similar to the CSSWG ones,
> although I'm not 100% sure.  Is that the case?

Yup, they should be. Fixed.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 21:26:10 UTC