- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:34:09 -0400
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, w3c-css-wg@w3.org
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On 2016-10-25 21:05, L. David Baron wrote: > I *think* we should fix these to be similar to the CSSWG ones, > although I'm not 100% sure. Is that the case? Yes, I think it was simply an oversight that these are different. Indeed, it has always been the case that Houdini drafts had GitHub issues as the preferred discussion method. > That said, fixing the fxtf boilerplate requires fixing the issue in: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2016OctDec/0090.html > about lack of an archive list for fxtf-draft issues. Created: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fxtf-archive/ -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 14:34:17 UTC