RE: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

> For example, #181 isn't meant to change behavior, but it is fairly large.

Given that ALL “substantive changes” must be completed by June 9, we definitely should be concentrating our current efforts on the open issues that may/will cause “substantive changes”.  Let’s leave any editorial items until after June 9 when we can continue to editorially improve the CR specs.

/paulc

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 7:51 PM
To: Jerry Smith (IEP) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; www-archive@w3.org; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>; Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

I support this to help us organize and prioritize. I do somewhat worry that it will mean one more decision to make or debate, though. For example, #181 isn't meant to change behavior, but it is fairly large.

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Jerry Smith (IEP) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Presumably V1Editorial changes would be accepted after June 9th?  Or even June 16th, since they wouldn’t reset the CRs?  When might we cut them off?

Jerry

From: Paul Cotton
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (IEP) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

>V1Editorial

I agree that it might be useful for the Editors to prioritize the V1Nonblocking issues AFTER all the V1 work is done.  But maybe we should consider adding a separate Editorial tag?


Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Mark Watson<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>
Sent: May 13, 2016 8:06 AM
To: Paul Cotton<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Jerry Smith (IEP)<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Matt Wolenetz<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>; Philippe Le Hégaret<mailto:plh@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

I should have addressed this only to editors / chairs.

In addition, it might be useful to have a "Final Review" label. We would replace "needs implementation" with this label when there is a Pull Request available for the issue.

Thoughts ?

...Mark

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote:
We have V1NonBlocking issues, some of which are substantial but only nice-to-have and some of which are purely editorial. I wonder if we should disambiguate them ?

V1Editorial ? I assume we can address such purely editorial issues after June 9th.

...Mark