RE: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

> Presumably V1Editorial changes would be accepted after June 9th?

Yes.

> Or even June 16th, since they wouldn't reset the CRs?

We might want to leave the candidate CR drafts stable thru the CfC period but that can be done by putting them in a separate stable location.

>When might we cut them off?

I believe we can continue making editorial changes until just before Aug 2 when we lock down the candidate Proposed Recommendations.

/paulc


From: Jerry Smith (IEP)
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:09 PM
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; www-archive@w3.org; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>; Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

Presumably V1Editorial changes would be accepted after June 9th?  Or even June 16th, since they wouldn't reset the CRs?  When might we cut them off?

Jerry

From: Paul Cotton
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:20 AM
To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (IEP) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

>V1Editorial

I agree that it might be useful for the Editors to prioritize the V1Nonblocking issues AFTER all the V1 work is done.  But maybe we should consider adding a separate Editorial tag?


Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Mark Watson<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>
Sent: May 13, 2016 8:06 AM
To: Paul Cotton<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Jerry Smith (IEP)<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>; www-archive@w3.org<mailto:www-archive@w3.org>; Matt Wolenetz<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>; Philippe Le Hégaret<mailto:plh@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Separate milestone for editorial issues ?

I should have addressed this only to editors / chairs.

In addition, it might be useful to have a "Final Review" label. We would replace "needs implementation" with this label when there is a Pull Request available for the issue.

Thoughts ?

...Mark

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote:
We have V1NonBlocking issues, some of which are substantial but only nice-to-have and some of which are purely editorial. I wonder if we should disambiguate them ?

V1Editorial ? I assume we can address such purely editorial issues after June 9th.

...Mark