[wbs] response to 'Table of content design'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Table of content
design' (public) for Peter Linss.

> 
> ---------------------------------
> Feedback
> ----
> Choose your preference below.
> 
> Note: User toggles will require JS and/or markup changes, which are
>   not in scope for 2016, but could happen in the future.
> 

 * (x) Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great;
      user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required.
 * ( ) Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great,
      but only acceptable if there's also a user toggle. 
 * ( ) Side-by-side ToC is acceptable only if it's triggered by the user. 
 * ( ) No side-by-side ToC, ever. 

> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> 2016 deployment
> ----
> Please tell us whether you can make the necessary markup change happen
>   for publications in 2016.
> 
> Note: respec and bikeshed will be automatically updated.
> 

 * (x) Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. 
 * ( ) No, we cannot generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents. 

> 
> These answers were last modified on 28 October 2015 at 03:02:06 U.T.C.
> by Peter Linss
> 
Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/tr_toc_2016/ until 2015-10-31.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 03:03:04 UTC