W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Defining exotic objects in IDL, HTML, or both?

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:41:07 -0400
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>
Cc: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5620FE73.8050009@mit.edu>
On 10/16/15 5:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> To be clear, there's no concept of 'wrapping' in the cross-origin spec.
>> Instead, the spec talks about 'minting' a fresh per-origin object to
>> represent a 'concept' (Window or Location).
> I don't understand how we can mint fresh objects yet also expect those
> objects to === each other if they proxy the same underlying
> object/concept.

I'm not sure what you mean here.  We don't expect them to be === to each 
other, but we also don't expect that lack of === to be observable 
(modulo some handwaving about document.domain, perhaps).

Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 13:41:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:35:26 UTC