- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:35:22 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On 10/12/15 10:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > The other benefit would be having only one specification being > responsible for the translation to ECMAScript We're not there anyway; consider the various specs using object/any and defining custom processing. > We would likely still need IDL to define these as IDL types somehow so > they can be used in IDL blocks. Hmm. Would we? Why? With the possible exception of same-origin WindowProxy, of course. -Boris
Received on Monday, 12 October 2015 16:35:54 UTC