- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:57:58 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On 9/28/2014 8:22 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > [ +Bcc: ab @ w3.org ] > > Re: >> [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc >> [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe#Procedures >> [3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/conf-code > > * [1] needs a "Status: ..." type statement like [3] has in its > boilerplate. > > * [1] and [3] should explicitly state in their boilerplate that > comments and change requests are welcome and include a publicly > archived list for the comments and diffs. > > * [2] include the status of the TF and if it is still active, how one > can join. I also think the TF's participant list shouldn't be hidden > behind Member confidentiality. > > * [2] asking to send comments to a private list seems inconsistent > with literally creating a `positive work environment`. As such this > doc should also include a public list for comments and change requests. In [2] we assure that people can ask questions to a private list. For example, an individual might feel that they were disrespected and might want to confidentially ask a question. Would it be OK if we both had a public list for public comments and a private list for those who wanted to make private inquiries? > > * [1], [3] add these as new components to one of the consortium's > Public Bug/Issue Tracker systems such as > <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> and include a link to > the tracker in the document's boilerplate. > >
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 14:58:05 UTC