W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2014

Re: Vibration

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:13:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78g52QXPYXhrHL7E13goqD_hG+e3kCcU_M2dcFjO9OTk+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi
<anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:
> Good suggestion, added:
>   http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#idl-def-VibratePattern

You can remove "The first method argument is referred to as vibration
pattern." now.

Also, the "perform vibration" steps still refer to a browsing context
(not available from workers) and the "processing vibration patterns"
algorithm (not present in e.g. the notification context). I think it
would be okay to make this vaguer and just say that if the "perform
vibration" steps are already running they can be canceled.

(Should navigator.vibrate() be present in workers by the way?)

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 12:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:35:06 UTC