- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:55:19 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>
- CC: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Hi Anne, FYI Frederick, > On 19 Nov 2014, at 12:04, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi > <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: >> I updated the Editor's Draft to provide the following hooks: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#dfn-vibration-pattern > > I was thinking of something like this in IDL: > > typedef (unsigned long or sequence<unsigned long>) VibratePattern; > > So I can refer to that and if we ever decide to allow other arguments > it would automatically work. Sorry for not being more clear. Good suggestion, added: http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#idl-def-VibratePattern >> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#dfn-validate-and-normalize > > This looks good. Ok. >> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/#dfn-perform-vibration > > This looks good too, except for the first step, which is not really > applicable for notifications, and even less for notifications from a > service worker (there's no document). Maybe that step should be > uplifted to "processing vibration patterns"? Makes sense, #dfn-perform-vibration updated as proposed. > Thanks for the quick reply and making this work! Anne - thanks for the suggestions and review! Frederick - since these changes are editorial in nature I updated the PR.html snapshot (as well as the PR-diff.html) accordingly, see: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2009/dap/vibration/PR.src.html.diff?r1=1.3;r2=1.4;f=h Thanks, -Anssi
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 11:55:53 UTC