- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:23:46 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, www-archive@w3.org
On 11/18/2014 06:05 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Forwarding. Fixed. Thanks! http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme Let me know if you spot anything more. > I didn't file a bug because that appears to be against Anne's document, and I didn't want to cause more confusion. Not a problem. By the way, the WHATWG URL Standard is now jointly edited. See: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#acknowledgments > Cheers, - Sam Ruby >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> Date: 18 November 2014 10:50:19 pm AEDT >> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> >> To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> >> Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> >> Subject: Re: URL status? >> >> On 11/18/2014 03:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> Hey Sam, >>> >>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 12:55 pm, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Since you have last looked at it, I've done a lot of work to make >>>> the syntax diagrams even more readable and more consistent with RFC >>>> 3986: >>>> >>>> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#parsing-rules >>>> >>>> If I can do more to make this document more consistent with RFC3986 >>>> and / or the proposed registry, don't hesitate to let me know. >>> >>> The most obvious difference -- >>> <http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme> doesn't >>> allow digits in schemes, whereas 3986 does (except as the first >>> character). Also, you allow "-" "+" and "." as the first character, >>> whereas 3986 doesn't. >> >> Can I get you to open a bug in bugzilla? There is a link at the >> top of the document which will help you do that. Either that or simply >> make this comment public someplace -- I care not where, forwarding this >> email to www-archive will serve my purposes. >> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> >> - Sam Ruby > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:24:12 UTC