Re: Fwd: URL status?

On 11/18/2014 06:05 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Forwarding.

Fixed.  Thanks!

http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme

Let me know if you spot anything more.

> I didn't file a bug because that appears to be against Anne's document, and I didn't want to cause more confusion.

Not a problem.  By the way, the WHATWG URL Standard is now jointly 
edited.  See:

https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#acknowledgments

> Cheers,

- Sam Ruby

>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: 18 November 2014 10:50:19 pm AEDT
>> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
>> To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
>> Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
>> Subject: Re: URL status?
>>
>> On 11/18/2014 03:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>> Hey Sam,
>>>
>>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 12:55 pm, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Since you have last looked at it, I've done a lot of work to make
>>>> the syntax diagrams even more readable and more consistent with RFC
>>>> 3986:
>>>>
>>>> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#parsing-rules
>>>>
>>>> If I can do more to make this document more consistent with RFC3986
>>>> and / or the proposed registry, don't hesitate to let me know.
>>>
>>> The most obvious difference --
>>> <http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme> doesn't
>>> allow digits in schemes, whereas 3986 does (except as the first
>>> character). Also, you allow "-" "+" and "." as the first character,
>>> whereas 3986 doesn't.
>>
>> Can I get you to open a bug in bugzilla?  There is a link at the
>> top of the document which will help you do that.  Either that or simply
>> make this comment public someplace -- I care not where, forwarding this
>> email to www-archive will serve my purposes.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> -- Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:24:12 UTC