- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:11 +1100
- To: www-archive@w3.org
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Forwarding. I didn't file a bug because that appears to be against Anne's document, and I didn't want to cause more confusion. Cheers, > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: 18 November 2014 10:50:19 pm AEDT > From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> > To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> > Subject: Re: URL status? > > On 11/18/2014 03:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hey Sam, >> >>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 12:55 pm, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >>> >>> Since you have last looked at it, I've done a lot of work to make >>> the syntax diagrams even more readable and more consistent with RFC >>> 3986: >>> >>> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#parsing-rules >>> >>> If I can do more to make this document more consistent with RFC3986 >>> and / or the proposed registry, don't hesitate to let me know. >> >> The most obvious difference -- >> <http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme> doesn't >> allow digits in schemes, whereas 3986 does (except as the first >> character). Also, you allow "-" "+" and "." as the first character, >> whereas 3986 doesn't. > > Can I get you to open a bug in bugzilla? There is a link at the > top of the document which will help you do that. Either that or simply > make this comment public someplace -- I care not where, forwarding this > email to www-archive will serve my purposes. > >> Cheers, >> >> -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > - Sam Ruby -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:05:39 UTC