W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > November 2014

Fwd: URL status?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:05:11 +1100
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-Id: <AD7AE4D9-C606-4CBB-82AB-7889285BC019@mnot.net>
To: www-archive@w3.org
Forwarding.

I didn't file a bug because that appears to be against Anne's document, and I didn't want to cause more confusion.

Cheers,


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> Date: 18 November 2014 10:50:19 pm AEDT
> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
> Subject: Re: URL status?
> 
> On 11/18/2014 03:04 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hey Sam,
>> 
>>> On 13 Nov 2014, at 12:55 pm, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Since you have last looked at it, I've done a lot of work to make
>>> the syntax diagrams even more readable and more consistent with RFC
>>> 3986:
>>> 
>>> http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#parsing-rules
>>> 
>>> If I can do more to make this document more consistent with RFC3986
>>> and / or the proposed registry, don't hesitate to let me know.
>> 
>> The most obvious difference --
>> <http://intertwingly.net/projects/pegurl/url.html#scheme> doesn't
>> allow digits in schemes, whereas 3986 does (except as the first
>> character). Also, you allow "-" "+" and "." as the first character,
>> whereas 3986 doesn't.
> 
> Can I get you to open a bug in bugzilla?  There is a link at the
> top of the document which will help you do that.  Either that or simply
> make this comment public someplace -- I care not where, forwarding this
> email to www-archive will serve my purposes.
> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 
> - Sam Ruby

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2014 23:05:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:35:06 UTC