- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:34:58 +0100
- To: "Kostiainen, Anssi" <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Device APIs Working Group <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote: > On 09 Oct 2014, at 15:46, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> Is there anything in http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/vibration/ you would >> have done differently today in terms of the API? We want to add >> vibration support to the notifications API as part of a general set of >> behaviors, see https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/issues/22 Was >> just wondering if the API should be the same or slightly different. In >> particular overloading long with a sequence of long does not seem >> great. > > We tried to keep the scope as tight as possible and did not add any extras, thus not much to do differently. Okay. I was wondering if you could provide the following features. * A dedicated name for the method argument, so that I can use it elsewhere. E.g. VibratePattern or some such. * A standalone algorithm that performs the additional validation required and normalizes the input. * A standalone algorithm that performs the actual vibration. This should make it possible to introduce notifications that vibrate while reusing the vibration infrastructure the Vibration API implicitly (hopefully soon explicitly) provides. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 17:35:29 UTC