Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification

Published http://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/ and announced on the home page
http://www.w3.org/News/2013#entry-9930

  --Mike

Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-09-05 16:11 +0000:

> > OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.
> 
> Status?
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael[tm] Smith [mailto:mike@w3.org] 
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:28 PM
> To: Paul Cotton
> Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.
> 
>   --Mike
> 
> Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000:
> 
> > There appears to have been some confusion here.  The WG Decision clearly stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the publication date.
> > 
> > /paulc
> > 
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Michael[tm] Smith
> > Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM
> > To: Paul Cotton
> > Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> 
> > (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby 
> > (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of 
> > the “Media Source Extensions” specification
> > 
> > Hi Paul,
> > 
> > Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000:
> > 
> > > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with 
> > > > Robin and/or Mike
> > >
> > > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published?  Is it going to be 
> > > published before next week’s publishing moratorium?
> > 
> > No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that 
> > before we can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set 
> > an end date/deadline for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now 
> > before September 5, and the LC-comments end date needs to be at least 
> > 3 weeks after that, so that means an end date of September 26th at the 
> > earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks.
> > 
> >   --Mike
> > 
> 
> --
> Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
> 

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 21:46:34 UTC