RE: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification

> OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.

Status?

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael[tm] Smith [mailto:mike@w3.org] 
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:28 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification

Hi Paul,

OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.

  --Mike

Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000:

> There appears to have been some confusion here.  The WG Decision clearly stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the publication date.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Michael[tm] Smith
> Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM
> To: Paul Cotton
> Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> 
> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby 
> (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org
> Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of 
> the “Media Source Extensions” specification
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000:
> 
> > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with 
> > > Robin and/or Mike
> >
> > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published?  Is it going to be 
> > published before next week’s publishing moratorium?
> 
> No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that 
> before we can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set 
> an end date/deadline for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now 
> before September 5, and the LC-comments end date needs to be at least 
> 3 weeks after that, so that means an end date of September 26th at the 
> earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks.
> 
>   --Mike
> 

--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 16:12:01 UTC