- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:11:29 +0000
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org)" <robin@w3.org>
- CC: "Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com)" <acolwell@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
> OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17. Status? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Michael[tm] Smith [mailto:mike@w3.org] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:28 PM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification Hi Paul, OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17. --Mike Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000: > There appears to have been some confusion here. The WG Decision clearly stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the publication date. > > /paulc > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Michael[tm] Smith > Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: Robin Berjon (robin@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> > (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby > (rubys@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org > Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of > the “Media Source Extensions” specification > > Hi Paul, > > Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000: > > > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with > > > Robin and/or Mike > > > > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published? Is it going to be > > published before next week’s publishing moratorium? > > No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that > before we can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set > an end date/deadline for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now > before September 5, and the LC-comments end date needs to be at least > 3 weeks after that, so that means an end date of September 26th at the > earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks. > > --Mike > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 16:12:01 UTC