- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:54:33 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>
On 14/05/2013 03:09 , Cameron McCormack wrote: > I am not sure where the various IDL parser tools come in to this. There > isn't a conformance class for IDL processors in the spec, and I'm not > sure whether the grammar in the spec being actually parseable is > something that is interesting to demonstrate by having programs that can > do that. At least because we would then need to have some tests for > those programs to show that they are correct. I don't think that we need to make a conformance class, test suite, implementation report, or whatever else for parsers. I think the way to use this information is to mention it on the Director's call as additional evidence that there's a healthy, interoperable ecosystem around WebIDL. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 08:55:40 UTC