W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2012

the 1st shortname and subsequent versions

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:17:56 -0400
Message-Id: <32C57CB0-E3BB-46E3-A21C-6621AE03D466@opera.com>
Cc: Jace Voracek <jacevoracek@me.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Reference: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Mar/0358

The story of the first time.

Le 12 mars 2012 à 13:03, Charles McCathieNevile a écrit :
> (BTW this also applies to things like CSS, and SVG, that have gone through multiple versions and have parts in active development along with parts that are generally believed to be completely stable...)

The short name and/or the generic name *if* the the technology becomes successful is indeed a point of reference. It seems there is no consistent policy across the URIs. http redirects to something outside of TR, CSS to a WG note, XML to the last version, etc.

→ Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (Second Edition)

→ XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition)

→ HTTP - Hypertext Transfer Protocol

→ Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010

→ XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0

→ Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)

→ Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition)

→ Document Not Found

Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 20:19:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:34:20 UTC